Click here to go back to the previous page
This webpage is my collection of notes for Mr. Healey's geometry class.
If you enjoy anime, you might enjoy this.
Congruent Angles Anime OP - A Cruel Angle's Thesis
Semester 2 | |
Date | Class Summary |
02/07/2023 | Today, we went over the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) postulate. |
02/08/2023 | Today, we went through a quick overview of the Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) postulate. |
02/10/2023 | Today was dedicted to practice with the SAS and ASA postulates as well as a quick overview of the Side-Side-Side (SSS) postulate. |
02/14/2023 | Today was an introduction to both the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) postulate and the Hypontenuse-Leg (HL) theorem. |
02/17/2023 | Today was a review on the five main congruency theorems/postulates. After the review, students took a quiz. |
03/01/2023 | Today, students were introduced to three theorems: the triangle sum theorem, the exterior angle theorem, and the isosceles triangle theorem. |
03/03/2023 | Today, we covered what a triangle's circumcenter is and how to find it. |
03/10/2023 | Today, the topic was the centroid of a triangle. |
03/14/2023 | First, we went over the side and angle relationships of a triangle (i.e., the shortest side of a triangle is opposite the smallest angle, and same goes for the longest side and the largest angle). Additionally, the triangle inequality theorem was introduced. |
03/15/2023 | Today was allocated for time to study in preperation for an upcoming quiz. |
03/17/2023 | Students took a quiz. |
03/21/2023 | Today was an introduction to similarity of shapes and the steps required to determine whether or not two shapes are similar. |
03/24/2023 | Today we covered the triangle similarity theorems: Angle-Angle (AA) triangle similarity theorem, Side-Side-Side (SSS) triangle similarity theorem, and Side-Angle-Side (SAS) triangle similarity theorem. |
03/28/2023 | We covered the triangle proportionality theorem. Its converse can be used to determine whether a line is parallel or not. We also covered partition segments. |
03/19/2023 |
Today we covered the geometric mean theorem.
Geometric Mean Theorem Figure above not drawn to scale. Proportionalities: \[ \frac{x}{a} = \frac{a}{c} \] \[ \frac{y}{b} = \frac{b}{c} \] \[ \frac{x}{h} = \frac{h}{y} \] |
04/18/2023 | "Are you Ready" preassesment. Introduction to the trigonometric ratios and how to find the sine, cosine, and tangent of different angles. |
04/19/2023 | Review with a Kahoot. Using trigononmetric ratios to solve for missing side lengths. |
04/21/2023 | Now we are using the inverse triogonometric functions to find missing angles of a right triangle. |
04/28/2023 | Review of solving for sides and angles with trigonometric functions. |
05/02/2023 | Solving sides for 45-45-90 triangles and 30-60-90 triangles. |
05/03/2023 | Solving trigonometric word problems. |
05/05/2023 | Today was a review for an upcoming quiz. |
05/09/2023 | Quiz day - basic trigonometry problems |
05/12/2023 |
"Are you Ready" preassesment. Today is the beginning of the circle unit. We covered central angles and inscribed angles. Central Angles Inscribed Angles are formed by two chords with a common endpoint on the circle. The intercepted arc is the arc that the inscribed angle creates. \[ 2 \cdot m\angle{\rm ABC} = m\widehat{\rm AC} \]The inscribed angle of a diameter is always 90 degrees. |
05/16/2023 | Today in class, we covered inscribed quadrilateral theorem and the congruent corresponding chords theorem. |
05/17/2023 | Today, we went over a couple of new theorems and definitions: tangent lines of circles, circumscribed angles, and the two tangent theorem. |
05/23/2023 | Review day |
05/26/2023 | Quiz day |
Here is some brief information on the topic of the notation used in geometry. The main figures that we work with are points, lines, line segments, rays, and angles. It is important to distinguish them between their measurements.
Figure | Measurement | |
Point | \[ \rm A \] | There is no measurement for points |
Lines | \[ \overleftrightarrow{\rm AB} \] | There is no (finite) measurement for lines |
Line segments | \[ \overline{\rm AB} \] | \[ \rm AB \] |
Rays | \[ \overrightarrow{\rm AB} \] | There is no (finite) measurement for rays |
Angles | \[ \angle{\rm ABC}\] | \[ m\angle{\rm ABC} \] |
Triangles | \[ \triangle{\rm ABC} \] | There is no measurement for triangles |
Arcs | \[ \widehat{\rm ABC} \] | \[ m\widehat{\rm ABC} \] |
One thing to note here is that figures can be congruent whereas measurements can be equal. For instance, if two line segments \( \overline{\rm AB} \) and \( \overline{\rm CD} \) are congruent, then their lengths, denoted \(\rm AB\) and \(\rm CD \), are equal. This is the definition of congruent segments.
\[ \overline{\rm AB} \cong \overline{\rm CD} \qquad \textrm{if, and only if} \qquad {\rm AB} = {\rm CD} \]The same thing goes for angles. Rays and lines do not have finite lengths because they both go off indefinetly and for triangles, there is not one sole measurement that describes it.
Given a diagram, congruent sides are denoted with hash marks. Congruent angles are marked in a somewhat similar fashion but with arcs instead.
\[ \triangle{\rm ABC} \cong \triangle{\rm XYZ} \]Alternate Exterior Angles Thereom
Same-side Interior Angles Postulate
Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
Corresponding Angles Theorem
What exactly are proofs? They are arguments that are used to prove statements.
Geometry has a close relationship to the history of proofs. Euclid was a geometer and logician, refered to by some as the "father of geometry". During the time of ancient Greek mathematicians, shapes were often used to prove different theorems. This basic idea of proofs still remains today. You must use axioms or postulates to build your argument. These are statements that are assumed to be true. The terms "axiom" and "postulate" have differed historically, however in modern day they are mostly interchangable. The term "postulate" is specific to geometry. They can be thought of as the building blocks of a proof.
The basic structure of a two column proof is as follows:
Statement | Reason |
With proofs, you should always start with your hypothesis and end with your conclusion. Your hypothesis is synonymous to your "given". Your conclusion is simply what you sought out to prove.
Statement | Reason |
(Hypothesis) | Given |
\[ \vdots \] | \[ \vdots \] |
(Conclusion) | Q.E.D. |
Q.E.D. is an abbreviation for the latin phrase quod erat demonstrandum. This translates to "which was to be demonstrated."
Here are some of the theorems/postulates used in geometry:
This can be thought of as a special case of the SSS postulate. Given two right triangles with two congruent sides, we can use the pythagorean theorem to solve for the remaining side.
\[ a^{2} + b^{2} = c^{2} \]The remaining side of one right triangle must be congruent to the remaining side of the other right triangle.
In math, one thing that I dislike is purely memorizing formulas. I will try to demonstrate a slightly more intuitive way of deriving and understanding the formulas for a circle. This approach involves the essential idea of calculus—infinitesimals. The key fact that you will have to remember is that the irrational constant pi, denoted by lowercase Greek letter \(\pi\), is the ratio of a circle's circumference (perimeter) to its diameter (width). This is like the definition of pi.
\[ \pi = \frac{C}{D} \]Immediately from this, we can solve for the circumference.
\[ C = \pi D \]By definition, the radius of a circle is twice its diameter.
\[ 2r = D \]Plugging this into the previous equation, we see that the circumference of a circle in terms of its radius is
\[ C = 2\pi r \]Now, how can we obtain the circle's area? First we will start with approximations. Notice that if we divided the circle into segments, we can approximate the area of each of them by treating them as triangles.
If we split the circle into four segments, the area of each of these segments is given by \(\frac{1}{2} r^{2} \). If we add these areas, we will get an approximation for the area of the entire circle.
\[ \textrm{Approximation } = 4 \left( \frac{1}{2}r^{2} \right) = 2r^{2} \]Obviously this is not such a great approximation. How do we make our approximation more accurate. To do this, we will divide the circle into more segments. When we do this, the associated error of each segment's approximation is reduced.
Now here comes the calculus! If we continue to split the circle into more and more segments, the error will continue to get smaller and smaller to the point where it is negligible (so small that we can consider it insignificant). When we do this we are left with a lot of very small triangles. These small triangles are called infinitesimals. By calclating the sum of their areas, we arrive at the area of the entire circle. To find this area, we use a the following pictorial representation.
Figure not drawn to scale
Notice that all of these triangles are congruent. If we have two congruent triangles, we can combine them into a single rectangle as we did above. With this fact, we can create one large rectangle that represents the area of the entire circle. Of course the area of a rectangle is simply length times width.
\[ \textrm{Area of Rectangle} = L \times W \]In this case, the length is half the circumference, \(\frac{1}{2}C\), and the width is the radius, \(r\). So we see that the area of the circle is
\[ \textrm{Area} = \frac{1}{2}C r \]Using the previous formula for the circumference, we can perform a substition.
\[ \textrm{Area} = \frac{1}{2}2\pi r^{2} = \pi r^{2} \]There we go!
\[ \textrm{Area of Circle} = \pi r^{2} \]With the formulae for the area of a circle and its circumference, we can obtain formulae for the arc length and area of a sector.
Sectors are portions of a fractions of a circle given by some angle \(\theta\). It is bounded by two radii and an arc of a circle.
Image Source: Wikipedia
Now we are onto arc length. The arc length measures a portion of the circumference of a circle. It is the length of an arc on a circle.
First, we must determine the ratio of the sector given by \(\theta\) to the whole circle. It will be a fraction. For this, we will need to use the fact that a full circle is 360° or \(2\pi\) radians.
When \(\theta\) is measured in radians, the fraction will
\[ \frac{\theta}{2\pi} \]How does this work? Let's say \(\theta = \pi \). Calculating the fraction, we get
\[ \frac{\theta}{2\pi} = \frac{\pi}{2\pi} = \frac{1}{2} \]This makes perfect sense. Half a circle is \(\pi\) radians. This implies that the arc length, denoted by \(s\), will be half of the circumference as well.
\[ s = \frac{1}{2}C \]This is essentially the formula for arc length. We multiply the percentange of the circle by the circumference and we obtain the corresponding arc length.
\[ s = \frac{\theta}{2\pi}C \]Remember that \(C = 2\pi r \)
\[ s = \frac{\theta}{2\pi}2\pi r = r\theta \]Arc Length Formula:
The formula for the arc length of a circle is
\[ s = r\theta \]Taking the same approach, we can calculate the area of sector. All we need is the ratio of the sector to the full circle and then we multiply that by the area of the full circle.
Area of Sector Formula:
\[ \textrm{Area of Sector} = \frac{\theta}{2\pi} \pi r^{2} = 2\pi \theta r \]When \(\theta\) is not measured radians, but instead degrees, you must use a conversion factor.
\[ \frac{\pi}{180°} \]Definitions:
Exterior angle
Remote interior angle
Theorems:
Theorems:
Check out the notes here.
There is a more interactive visual that I created on Desmos.
Formula | |
Midpoint | \( (\overline{x}, \overline{y}) = \left(\frac{x_{1} + x_{2}}{2}, \frac{y_{1} + y_{2}}{2} \right) \) |
Slope | \( m_{1} = \frac{y_{2} - y_{1}}{x_{2} - x_{1}} \) |
Perpendicular Slope | \( m_{2} = -\frac{1}{m_{1}} = \frac{x_{1} - x_{2}}{y_{2} - y_{1}} \) |
Slope-intercept Form | \( y = mx + b \) |
Point-slope Form | \( y - y_{1} = m(x - x_{1}) \) |
Perpendicular Bisector of \(\overline{\rm AB}\) where \({\rm A} = (x_{1}, y_{1})\) and \({\rm B} = (x_{2}, y_{2})\) | \( \begin{align} y &= m_{2}(x - \overline{x}) + \overline{y} \\ &= \frac{x_{1} - x_{2}}{y_{2} - y_{1}}\left(x - \frac{x_{1} + x_{2}}{2} \right) + \frac{y_{1} + y_{2}}{2} \end{align} \) |